You’re welcome
Great news about the replacement activation code and the RAID5 rebuild 
A few thoughts on the other things you noticed:
1. Storage UI lag
I would expect the N54L to feel noticeably slower than your EliteDesk 800 G3. The N54L only has a dual-core AMD Turion II Neo N54L at 2.2 GHz, so the ZimaOS web UI and storage services have much less CPU available.
The Storage page can also be relatively expensive because ZimaOS queries disk/SMART information when loading storage details. There is even a current ZimaOS issue where storage queries can become very slow while waiting for disk health polling. With four mechanical drives plus RAID, some delay would therefore not surprise me.
That said, 20–85% CPU while apparently idle sounds worth investigating rather than assuming it is normal.
Could you run:
uptime
top -b -n1 | head -25
ps -eo pid,comm,%cpu,%mem --sort=-%cpu | head -15
preferably when the dashboard is showing high CPU usage? That should tell us whether it is real CPU activity or just the ZimaOS gauge behaving strangely.
Also, if the RAID has only recently finished rebuilding, I would give it some time before judging idle behaviour.
Unfortunately, the N54L CPU isn’t really upgradeable in the normal sense because it is soldered directly to the motherboard.
If you’re planning to keep the N54L long-term and run more and more applications on it, though, there is another route. Some users have reused the N54L chassis and fitted a modern Intel N100-based Mini-ITX motherboard inside it.
That gives you a much faster CPU, modern UEFI support, and much lower power consumption than a traditional desktop CPU, while still keeping the nice 4-bay MicroServer case.
So I wouldn’t spend much effort trying to replace the original N54L processor itself. For a long-term upgrade project, an N100 motherboard conversion is probably much more worthwhile.
2. Blank CPU/RAM and Network Monitor pages
Since the server itself is working, I suspect either a ZimaOS UI/telemetry compatibility issue with this older hardware. ZimaOS officially supports generic x86-64 hardware, but there are still reports/requests around some Zima-specific UI features not behaving correctly on non-Zima hardware.
You can quickly confirm that Linux itself sees the information correctly:
free -h
cat /proc/loadavg
cat /proc/net/dev
If those look normal while the web graphs remain blank, I would consider it a ZimaOS UI issue rather than an N54L hardware problem.
3. DAS: USB 3 or eSATA?
For permanent use, I would personally choose eSATA, provided the DAS is detected reliably and presents its RAID volume correctly.
The N54L has a native rear eSATA Gen2 port. Its original onboard USB ports are actually only USB 2.0, so if you have USB 3.0 on yours it must be coming from an added PCIe controller.
For a permanently attached SATA DAS, eSATA has a few advantages:
- more direct SATA connection;
- usually better SMART/drive command passthrough;
- no USB-to-SATA bridge/reset quirks;
- generally something I would trust more for an always-connected storage device.
USB 3 can theoretically be faster than the N54L’s eSATA Gen2, but for a NAS I would favour reliability over a benchmark difference.
One caveat: if your DAS depends on an eSATA port multiplier to expose several individual disks, we should check compatibility first. If the DAS performs RAID0 internally and exposes one logical disk to the N54L, then eSATA would definitely be my first choice.